"Why I Want To Fuck Donald Trump" on view now at Joshua Liner Gallery (Photo courtesy of Joshua Liner Gallery)

“Why I Want To Fuck Donald Trump” on view now at Joshua Liner Gallery (Photo courtesy of Joshua Liner Gallery)

Last week’s video of Donald Trump bragging about sexual assault threw a giant dildo into a campaign that seemed impervious to shame, just as the candidate had almost started seeming more presidential (at least, in light of the spotty track record of previous presidents). As screwed up as the whole thing is, nothing in the video was all that surprising. The “locker room talk” only confirmed Trump’s image as a billionaire playboy who trades skyscrapers (his most phallic assets) like Pokémon cards, and gets whatever his little Trump desires.

“His whole image is vulgarly sexual in a way,” agreed Alfred Steiner, the curator of a very timely new art show. “And he’s played right into that the whole time.”

Steiner’s exhibition, Why I Want To Fuck Donald Trump, has been in the works for a while now, but the timing couldn’t have been better when it opened Thursday at Joshua Liner Gallery in Chelsea. The basic thrust of the show, Steiner explained, is “how sex permeates electoral politics.” And it’s not just Trump who’s been rendered in a less-than-flattering light. Steiner and the 22 other participating artists slapped Dicks and Virginias all over American political history. Candidates on both sides of the aisle, from Nixon to Clinton, were caught in the crossfire and no one, not even Old Glory, JFK, nor Reagan’s beloved jelly beans were spared. In other words, this thing is yuge.

(Photo courtesy of Joshua Liner Gallery)

(Photo courtesy of Joshua Liner Gallery)

The vast majority of the work was commissioned by Steiner specially for this show, with just a few pieces made long before. But, really, the idea was birthed from a series Steiner started way back before the primaries: portraits of the candidates “made up entirely of genitalia,” as he put it.

The show’s centerpiece is a large diptych from this series, the left half of which is the titular Donald Trump portrait– on the right is a similar piece titled “Why I Want to Fuck Hillary Clinton.” They’re not the most centrally placed works or particularly colorful even, but together they’re the stickiest eye-suckers in whole dang room. Personally, I was drawn straight to the Donald, and locking eyes with him was like coming face-to-face, eyes-to-sex-hole with a great blizzard of humanity– gushy balls, erect penises, dilated buttholes, and more shades and shapes of vagina than I’d ever seen all in one place. It felt a little bit like being dick slapped. I was spellbound.

The bits and body parts Steiner has painted into this onslaught are so lifelike that the two portraits feel more like collages than paintings. Only the slightest blur gives them away as watercolor on canvas, otherwise Steiner is a master of a particular kind of photographic lighting.

Detail from Alfred Steiner's "Why I Want To Fuck Donald Trump" (Photo: Nicole Disser)

Detail from Alfred Steiner’s “Why I Want To Fuck Donald Trump” (Photo: Nicole Disser)

“Virtually all of the [source] imagery is pornographic, it tends to be lit in a certain way which gives you intense highlights, it’s almost over-lit,” he explained. “These are things that you’re not normally seeing, even in recordings of these acts being performed.”

Eschewing the obvious butthole reference, Trump’s trademark pursed lips consist of inner and outer labia, unfurled at their grandest expression, gushing forward in a river of love goop. It’s the Democratic contender who gets the (gaping) asshole for a mouth.

The context made me realize just how salacious Trump really is– his nickname, “The Donald,” is a code word for ween, obviously. The way his name is slapped on everything from vodka bottles to casinos attests to a far-flung seed. But Steiner’s work breaks all that down. There’s a certain level of violence to the portraits which makes it so you can almost hear the skin-on-skin slapping and animal floppery we call politics, and then the darkest truth of all emerges: Most politicians aren’t all that different from Trump– they’re just better groomed beasts with a muzzle.

(Photo courtesy of Joshua Liner Gallery)

(Photo courtesy of Joshua Liner Gallery)

Most people might make the same mistake I did and assume (initially, anyway) that Why I Want To Fuck Donald Trump is a reactionary art show, possibly even the art world’s well-crafted response to one recent, obsessively covered #DaddyWillSaveUs, which billed itself as a total bullshit media stunt “pro-Trump art show” with contributions from far-right wing figures and “Western Chauvinists” like Gavin McInnes (an increasingly active guy in the NYC cultural scene)  and Milo Yiannopoulos (who was banned from Twitter last summer).

The parallels are all there– #DaddyWillSaveUs grew out of the sexed-up #Twinks4Trump campaign (one that, in turn, may have taken its name from another, actually funny Twitter parody account). Both made a big to-do of injecting some much-need sex appeal into the Trump campaign, referring to Big Blond as “Daddy.”

Actually, Steiner said he started planning his show long before #DaddyWillSaveUs went public, and insisted that he’s not running an “anti-Trump” art show anyway. “Of course, there are elements of it that are undeniable,” he said, conceding that some artists might have negative feelings toward Trump that come into play in their work. “But I’d like to think it’s a little more nuanced than that.”

(Photo courtesy of Joshua Liner Gallery)

(Photo courtesy of Joshua Liner Gallery)

Things have changed in the race immensely since he started painting the portrait, but particularly in the last week or so. No fewer than 11 women have come forward with allegations of sexual assault. “It’s made me feel a little more justified in making such a vulgar work,” Steiner admitted.

After the opening, it was immediately clear that the art show is, well, just an art show, not a PR circus hellbent on manufacturing controversy. The only egregious blank spot was the lack of anything about Searcy Hayes, the Ted Cruz doppelgänger-turned-porn star whose stunning achievement in post-modernism is just begging to be included.

But there’s already a whole lot going on– the show’s name is a mouthful, which hints toward some bulging baggage. You might recognize it from an experimental short story written in 1968 by J. G. Ballard, Why I Want to Fuck Ronald Reagan.

“It’s an odd essay,” Steiner said. “Well, not essay– it’s more like a fictional scientific abstract where presumably these scientists are recording the results of these experiments conducted on patients with general paresis, which is the condition you have in late-stage syphilis, and they’re finding the optimal car-crash death for Ronald Reagan.” Some of the surreal “scientific” findings include the prevalence of “powerful erotic fantasies of an anal-sadistic,” which participants seem to associate with the “image of the Presidential contender.” The shadowy researchers hope to “construct a rectal modulus of Reagan and the auto-disaster of maximized audience arousal” in the near future.

Ballard basically deflates the largess of Reagan (who was a presidential hopeful back then) to the equivalent of a blow-up doll, and this same sort of objectification of the body politic is mirrored all over the exhibition.

Weirdly, Trump just happened to be the first candidate Steiner painted for a series of portraits he’d planned that would depict the primary contenders. “It’s given me a perverse reason to root for Trump,” he noted. “But I also have a sense of responsibility. If there was a magical genie who told me that whoever I painted first would become president, I might have reversed the order.”

Below, we’ve included our own order– our top picks from the show, in no particular order. 

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

1.Trump (Clinton) and Clinton (Trump) (2016) Alfred Steiner

Steiner’s other contribution to the show renders the candidates in halftone, not flesh tones, but the tension here is equally high. Much like their real selves, when the cameras show up, the candidates change their tone completely. To see their respective on-camera transformations, switch on your flash and wait patiently for autofocus.

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

2. The Burial of Liberty (2016), Aaron Johnson 

For this painting Aaron Johnson used a unique process– applying acrylic to polyester knit mesh, which Steiner described as “painting backwards”– to share his gory vision of one particularly glorious psychedelic orgy. Standouts from our nation’s proud political history have gathered for Lady Liberty’s burial, which should be wrapping up real soon, just as soon as she finishes birthing Baby Donald Trump and, you know, delivering the downfall of Western civilization. Note there’s a booger-haired Hillary Clinton leading the ritual soul sucking.

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

3. Trump Cigarettes I and Trump Cigarettes II (2016), Antony Micallef 

Antony Micallef’s tiny, impressionistic oil paintings, done on two separate Marlboro packs, may be sorta blurry, but they’re a dead-on depiction of the many strange capabilities of Trump’s remarkably malleable mushface. I guess 70 years of stretching the truth will eventually start to stretch your face out.

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

4. Leaving the American Sector (2016), Ana Wolovick

This multi-layered work looks like it an apocalyptic newsreel that has jumped out of the time-space continuum and into the fourth dimension. Now, we can look down through a magic prism and a see a whole lot indeed– from the late 1600s when the Spaniards wiped out Mayan civilization to the post-World War II division of Germany, all the way up to now, when Trump Tower has taken on a whole new darkness. The painting seems to imply parallels between Nazi party imagery and American patriotic symbolism (are those Parteiadler at the top? or just eagles?) and there’s a clever connection between the Berlin Wall and Trump’s own plans to erect a wall.

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

5. Fuck(ing) Trump (2016)William Powhida 

Oh, you better believe that William Powhida went there. The artist laid out a comprehensive, bullet-point list that details the nitty gritty of what doing coitus with Trump actually entails. Highlights: “The thought/image of his sagging gut penis cover is HORRIFIC” and “It’s easier to imagine Melania shitting in his mouth screaming ‘Eat it you fat fuck!'”

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

6. Trump Mao and Clinton Mao (2016), Tom Sanford

Tom Sanford probably should have titled his dueling portraits “Too Real” and “Too, Too Real. The artist somehow got his paintbrushes on a pair of matching, authentic Mao portraits from China, and amazingly didn’t seem to have too much trouble superimposing Hill and Trump’s faces over Mao’s. (Well, he made it look easy, at least.) The sexy comrade jacket stayed.

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

7. The Legacy Stone Project (The Donald Trump Tombstone) (2016), Brian Andrew Whiteley 

The best known piece in the show is Brian Andrew Whiteley’s sculpture of an actual headstone dedicated to Donald Trump. It became a minor celebrity when it was (hilariously) seized by the NYPD. The artist kept the evidence tags and, after its brief term of detention, Whiteley’s piece has continued making the rounds, including a recent stop at Christopher Stout Gallery in Bushwick. “It’s one of the more direct ones, message-wise,” Steiner admitted. “The date is not on there– that’s the openness of this piece, I think. But it could also be a parody of the way that liberals look at Trump.”

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

8. The Most Notable and Selfless Profession (2016), Patrick Meagher 

It’s best not to question the verifiability of Patrick Meagher’s Venn diagrams. Regular numbers won’t necessarily work in his favor, but he’s really getting at something with the intersecting circles indicating that, in order for anyone to “give a shit” about “non-profit advocacy” a whole bunch of people have to “want that money”/ presumably get that money, and it has to be in the best interest of corporate lobbyists, the executive branch, ongoing/future campaigns, and “partisan hacks.” Dang.

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

(Photo: Nicole Disser)

9. Hill Yeah! (2016), Eric Yahnker 

In Eric Yahnker’s colored-pencil portrait of Hillary, you know she’s at the tail end of screaming “Yeaaahhh boy.” Hill’s makeover is so Gen-X that Dave Navarro is probably rifling through his fuzzy purse searching desperately for her number (“I know it’s here somewhere, gah!”). At the same time, her new look is strangely believable. Could Clinton’s tongue piercing be her own presidential smoking habit? Obama will probably have some stellar advice.